Let me hold your hand
HOME
ask
DATA
MORE
THEME
DATE
NOTES
FROM
beyond-far-horizons:
“faejilly:
“prismatic-bell:
“ruffboijuliaburnsides:
“prismatic-bell:
“randomslasher:
“karadin:
“madmollcosplay:
“fantastic-nonsense:
“seldo:
“wemblingfool:
“banjobutch:
“xbuster:
“Marvel movies have completely eliminated the...

beyond-far-horizons:

faejilly:

prismatic-bell:

ruffboijuliaburnsides:

prismatic-bell:

randomslasher:

karadin:

madmollcosplay:

fantastic-nonsense:

seldo:

wemblingfool:

banjobutch:

xbuster:

Marvel movies have completely eliminated the concept of practical effects from the movie-watching public’s consciousness

Not just practical effects just like. Basic set design lol

How… How do they think sci-fi was done before CGI?

Really badly? Do you remember sci-fi before CGI? It was shit. And don’t say Star Wars because they went back and fixed that with CGI later.

*big sigh* *puts head in hands* heathens who’ve never watched pre-MCU sci-fi movies OR the unedited Star Wars movies, my beloathed

So first of all, most people agree that the majority of the “CGI fixes” in the Star Wars original trilogy (excluding minor visual/sound effects like lightsaber colors and blaster sounds) are unececssary, extremely conspicuous, and/or bad. This is not news to literally anyone older than about 20 who has consumed Star Wars content on any level. There are quite literally two very famous ‘despecialized’ fan projects explicitly dedicated to un-doing all of the shitty “fixed” CGI effects while simultaneously restoring the OT in HD.

And yes, I do, in fact, remember sci-fi special effects before CGI was the foundational cornerstone of moviemaking. It was not, in fact, shit:

image
image
image
image
image
image

Also, ironically I can show you by….*gasp* using fucking Star Wars, of all things. Welcome to the Tatooine pod race set of The Phantom Menace, which was not, as popularly believed, CGI’d but was instead a fully-built miniature set:

image
image
image
image

Yes, they built the entire set as a minature, built life-sized pod racers for the actors, then spliced the two together using digital effects. Yes, they did such a fantastic job that people think the entire set and scene sequence was basically completely CGI’d to this day. You’re fucking welcome for undervaluing the time, effort, and talents of set designers by implying that set design and practical effects inherently mean things will look like shit.

CGI also ages really poorly. What you think looks incredibly realistic now is going to look terrible in a few years. Just look at the original vs remastered Star Trek. They “restored” Star Trek around 2006 and replaced a lot of the practical effects with CGI, and maybe it looked ok in 2006, but it looks so bad and fake now.

image
image

You can see a video comparison for one episode here: https://youtu.be/ruPVTPCavdM

In the 60s they built a whole model of the Enterprise, complete with blinking lights and beautifully sculpted/painted details. It looks stunning! Then they replaced it with that horribly smooth and fake looking cgi ship.

Just look at this beauty

image
image
image

You can see the model at the Air and Space Museum in DC

Unfortunately the remastered version is the only version available to stream, but you can still find DVDs with the original effect.

made in 1968 and still stunning 2001 A Space Odyssey

image

Originally posted by maekar76

image

Originally posted by bongjoonsho

image

Originally posted by scoop16

the designers worked with engineers at NASA to make realistic futuristic special effects using models and matte paintings no computer effects at all! - and incidentally inspired David Bowie to write Space Oddity, later performed in space by astronaut Chris Hadfield

image

Originally posted by laughing-on-the-internet

image

Originally posted by samuelljackson

image

Originally posted by vahkarianmoved

image

Originally posted by junkfoodcinemas

The CGI of the original Jurassic Park may not be aging well (though arguably still better than some), but the practical effects will always look stunning. 

I want to talk fantasy.

image

Originally posted by cinema-phantom

This shot was achieved with splicing and green screen.

image

Originally posted by time-means-nothing-for-me

This wild-looking shot (and similar manipulations) was famously achieved by having a professional juggler in a duplicate of Bowie’s jacket and gloves sitting behind him, basically with Bowie in his lap, doing the handwork while Bowie kept his arms behind the juggler. You may have seen a game based on this on Whose Line Is It Anyway.

image

Originally posted by inafarawaykingdomrol

This? Wires! Splicing! THE CGI TO DO THIS DIDN’T EXIST YET! (The juggler is hidden under the cape. If there’s a scene where he’s wearing a cape, that’s actually probably why.)

image

Originally posted by thebowieologist

And this? This heartstopping shot?


This does appear to be from the version with CGI—


—CGI THAT WAS USED TO ERASE THE SHADOW FROM THE PRACTICAL EFFECT.


The shot itself hasn’t changed. The lift itself was done with wires and Bowie was given some propulsion with an air cannon so he could make that turn at speed. A minor amount of CGI was used in the 30th anniversary to “touch up” the work done in 1986, and one of the things they did was to remove a shadow on the wall from one of the wires.

How about this?

image

Originally posted by 60s-heartshaped-chevrolet

You don’t know it, but you’re looking at a practical effect. In real life, the Ruby Slippers are almost orange. That luxe, rich ruby color showed up on the film as black when the shoes were the correct color, so the costumers adjusted the actual costume to give the color they wanted.


image

Originally posted by witchinghour

A MODEL OF A HOUSE SHOT INSIDE A NYLON STOCKING ATTACHED TO A FAN.


image

Originally posted by ernestsewell

MAN IN A COSTUME.


image


HORSES DUSTED WITH COLORED GELATIN.

image

Originally posted by dailyflicks

And this? This is where it would’ve been useful to have CGI. Margaret Hamilton got really badly burned on the steam doing one of her entrance/exits, and ended up in the hospital. THIS is what you use CGI for.

You come into my house and insult practical effects?


I’ll just finish off by reminding you THIS IS ONE, TOO.

image

Originally posted by cinemotionpicture

That last one, iirc, was there was a double in a sepia-toned costume, and the interior door and wall there was painted brown, so when it was lit and shot it all appeared to still be in the sepia tone of the Kansas scenes, and part of why Dorothy stepped back out of the frame was so the double and Judy Garland (in the proper blue-and-white costume) could swap.

You are correct. The double’s name, by the way, was Bobbi Koshay.

#this is also a purely personal opinion but aged practical effects are charming #in a way that aged cgi is not (via @glorious-spoon)

On the 20th anniversary of LOTR someone needs to talk about the way they did the Balrog effects and why it’s still awesome now.

DATE
NOTES
FROM

systlin:

brainlessoutofdate:

This is so relatable, I’m dying.

LOUDER FOR THOSE IN THE BACK

DATE
NOTES
FROM

darcyolsson:

darcyolsson:

darcyolsson:

image
image

happy first Bella From Twilight Depression Month

image
image

happy second Bella From Twilight Depression Month

image
image

happy last Bella From Twilight Depression Month

DATE
NOTES
FROM

two-crabs:

i live in constant struggle between “you’re wrong” and “but i don’t want to start shit”

DATE
NOTES
FROM
sugarmint-dreams:
“flowers & books ✿
-
my shop
”

sugarmint-dreams:

flowers & books ✿

-

my shop

DATE
NOTES
FROM

leetaekim:

2gether rewatch: episode 7

i posted that picture on IG just to let you know… that even though you didn’t ask me to be your fake date… you would never be a stranger to me. i didn’t go talk to you. i didn’t go to see you. i did what you asked. i thought i could handle it. but when i saw you with someone else, i don’t think i can stop my feelings— and do you think i can? from the day you disappeared, my life wasn’t the same. whatever i did , wherever i went, you caught up with me. even in my dreams, you were there teasing me. are you going to take responsibility for what you did?
DATE
NOTES
FROM

konaizumi:

Man: just be casual, try some light flirting

Sarawat: yes, okay, i can do that!

[later]

Tine: nice work out there, high five!

Tine: *high fives Sarawat*

Sarawat: *interwines their fingers*

Tine: what

Sarawat: i’m in love with you

DATE
NOTES
FROM

rosa-de-bayahibe:

I used to feel bad about not being a super funny and exciting and charismatic type of person, that I was too boring and weighing ppl down and ruining their fun. But I’ve learned recently that its ok to be the quiet and serious one, that those are likeable traits in and of themselves. They can be very grounding and calming, and sometimes thats what you need.

Life can be pretty hectic, and sometimes we need someone who we can just chill with and quietly enjoy each other’s presence, or have a serious non-judgmental conversation with.

Maybe we’re not the life of the party, but maybe we’re somebody’s capybara, and that’s just as important and valuable

DATE
NOTES
FROM

rainbowrowell:

image

Sometimes yelling about something actually works!!! AT YOUR REQUEST: a UK hardcover of Carry On that matches the rest of the trilogy! With a floral stained edge and beautiful illustrated endpapers by @mara-miranda. Signed by me! Preorder now. Thank you, Waterstones 💚💜💚 (Order yours now. This is an extremely limited edition, just like the others.)

TAGS
DATE
NOTES
FROM

lokiluafeyson:

giftober 2021 ≡ day nine || fighting
valkyrie vs loki || thor: ragnarok

DATE
NOTES
FROM

girlschasinggirls:

straightgirls:

this doesn’t fit my blog at all but i had to post it here because this story is legit the wildest thing i’ve seen this month and everyone needs to see it. unmute this I PROMISE YOU WON’T REGRET IT

omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!